Hello, Tim. On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 08:53:21PM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > If this daemon works as advertised, we will explore moving all write > traffic to use it. I still have concerns that this can't handle read > traffic at the scale we need.
At least from the kernel side, cgroup doesn't and won't have any problem with direct reads. > Tejun, I am not sure why chown came back into the conversation. This > is a replacement for that. I guess I'm just confused because of the mentions of chown. If it isn't about giving unmoderated write access to untrusted domains, everything should be fine. Thanks! -- tejun ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base. Download it for free now! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
