Le lundi 25 novembre 2013 à 20:52 -0800, Tim Hockin a écrit : > At the start of this discussion, some months ago, we offered to > co-devel this with Lennart et al. They did not seem keen on the idea. > > If they have an established DBUS protocol spec, we should consider > adopting it instead of a new one, but we CAN'T just play follow the > leader and do whatever they do, change whenever they feel like > changing. > > It would be best if we could get a common DBUS api specc'ed and all > agree to it. Serge, do you feel up to that?
Machined/Machinectl D-Bus API is what you are meaning (in systemd). I'd suggest to send a mail on systemd-devel mailing list to see when this API will be considered stable and comment on it. -- Frederic Crozat <fcro...@suse.com> SUSE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
