Hey Dwight,

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:35 PM, S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org> wrote:
>> Hmm, you are testing through the go binding correct? I ran these two
>> without error:
>>
>> ./src/tests/lxc-test-concurrent -i 200 -j 8 create,destroy
>> ./src/tests/lxc-test-concurrent -i 100 -j 8
>>
>> I wonder if lxc-test-concurrent will fail for you?

As you suspected lxc-test-concurrent runs fine on my system, I also
tried running concurrent_stress with directory backend and as long as
I see it also works fine. I guess the initial failure I observed had
something with btrfs backend, I'll try to reproduce it and possibly
spend some time on it to see what's happening.

> Hmm will try ASAP. Also I remembered that I started to use "best" bdev
> option on my desktop machine which uses btrfs so maybe it has
> something to do with it. I'll revert back to "dir" type on Go bindings
> and try that again as well. Will report back as soon as I have
> something!

Cheers,
-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps
OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access
Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server.
Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to