Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com): > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:42:54 -0600 > Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com> wrote: > > > Quoting Dwight Engen (dwight.en...@oracle.com): > > > This is likely unnecessary, but is consistent with other uses of > > > fopen()/fclose() in lxc. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dwight Engen <dwight.en...@oracle.com> > > > > Do you think, regardless of your other fix, that it would still be > > worth adding an fsync? > > Hmm, good question. I guess its possible lxcapi_save_config() could be > called by two different user processes for the same container and we'd > wind up with a similar situation. Seems like we're trying to use the > disk lock to protect against that,
Heh, yeah, that too. Even worse. >...but it wasn't enough so maybe we do ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
