Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 13:00 -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com): > > > I did incorporate your suggestion of using the hash of the rootfs path > > > as the subdirectory under the hosts /dev/ for the container. I also > > > > (Printed this out to look it over, just putting all my comments together > > here) : > > > > 1. I think if /dev is not devtmpfs, we should just bail on this. > > > > 2. You say in comments that you're using the cgroup name, but it seems > > you're actually just using the container name? > > Ok... I'm going to experiment with this a bit but check me on this... > In the routine "lxc_setup()" the first parameter is "name". Is that the > cgroup name or just the container name? I take it, from your remark, > this is just the container name and the unique cgroup name may be > something different.
Correct. But if you're using $(echo "$lxcpath.$lxcname" | sha1sum) why do you need the cgroup name? > Is that something I should be pulling out of the > cgroup info structure? Yes. I don't know offhand where though. -serge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep Android apps secure. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
