Quoting Jäkel, Guido (g.jae...@dnb.de): > Hello, > > I'm late but I just want to mention that I expect that all this kind of > "unlinking" on a NFS will show up as a stale NFS handle, i.e. a still visible > hidden directory entry (.nfs00??????????????????????). Therefore, one have to > take care of this (i.e. exclude) if he make a copy of such (for the purpose > of cloning or even for backups). This isn't a LXC-, but a NFS-caveat. An > NFS-aware will (should) know about to deal with this but there he should have > to know (by the documentation) that LXC will use this unlinking mechanism to > correlate this stale handle.
Will it use the same name every time? Will it eventually go away? I really don't want a new switch for this. If we have to do something I'd rather detect nfs and do something different. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments: 1. Consolidate legacy IT systems to a single system of record for IT 2. Standardize and globalize service processes across IT 3. Implement zero-touch automation to replace manual, redundant tasks http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=51271111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
