Quoting S.Çağlar Onur (cag...@10ur.org):
> What about something like following?
This looks good to me.
Acked-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serge.hal...@ubuntu.com>
> diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> index 480c4f5..eb99e5a 100644
> --- a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> +++ b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_create(struct lxc_container *c, char
> *t, char *const argv[])
> int len, nargs = 0;
> char **newargv;
>
> - if (!c)
> + if (!c || access(c->lxc_conf->rootfs.path, F_OK) == 0)
> return false;
>
> len = strlen(LXCTEMPLATEDIR) + strlen(t) + strlen("/lxc-") + 1;
> @@ -523,9 +523,6 @@ static bool lxcapi_create(struct lxc_container *c, char
> *t, char *const argv[])
> goto out;
> }
>
> - if (!create_container_dir(c))
> - goto out;
> -
> if (!c->save_config(c, NULL)) {
> ERROR("failed to save starting configuration for %s\n", c->name);
> goto out;
> @@ -767,6 +764,9 @@ static bool lxcapi_save_config(struct lxc_container *c,
> const char *alt_file)
> return false;
> }
>
> + if (!create_container_dir(c))
> + return false;
> +
> FILE *fout = fopen(alt_file, "w");
> if (!fout)
> return false;
> @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_destroy(struct lxc_container *c)
> pid_t pid;
> int ret, status;
>
> - if (!c)
> + if (!c || access(c->lxc_conf->rootfs.path, F_OK) != 0)
> return false;
>
> pid = fork();
>
>
> and this is how it behaves with it;
>
> caglar@qgq:~$ cat test.py
> import lxc
> c = lxc.Container("abcdef")
> print (c.set_config_item("lxc.utsname", "abcdef"))
> print (c.save_config())
> print (c.create("ubuntu"))
> print (c.create("ubuntu"))
> print (c.destroy())
> print (c.destroy())
>
> caglar@qgq:~$ sudo python3 test.py
> True
> True
> True
> False
> True
> False
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 7:26 PM, S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stéphane,
> >
> > Hmm, then I believe there is another bug somewhere cause here is what
> > happens with your ordering;
> >
> > caglar@qgq:~/Project/lxc$ sudo python3
> > Python 3.2.3 (default, Oct 19 2012, 19:53:16)
> > [GCC 4.7.2] on linux2
> > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
> > >>> import lxc
> > __main__:1: Warning: The python-lxc API isn't yet stable and may change at
> > any point in the future.
> > >>> c = lxc.Container("abcdef")
> > >>> c.set_config_item("lxc.utsname", "blah")
> > True
> > >>> c.set_config_item("lxc.utsname", "abcdef")
> > True
> > >>> c.save_config()
> > False
> > >>> c.config_file_name
> > '/var/lib/lxc/abcdef/config'
> >
> > so it looks like save_config don't work if the container directory is not
> > there and as long as I see only create calls create_container_dir to do
> > that.
> >
> > Maybe correct way to handle that is to call create_container_dir from
> > save_config as well but checking the rootfs directory's existence from
> > create/destrory?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Stéphane Graber <stgra...@ubuntu.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 03/31/2013 04:22 PM, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> > > > From: "S.Çağlar Onur" <cag...@10ur.org>
> > > >
> > > > Currently it behaves like following which might be confusing for the
> > code that checks the return value of those calls to determine whether
> > operation completed successfully or not.
> > > >
> > > >>> c = lxc.Container("r")
> > > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > > > True
> > > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > > > True
> > > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > > > True
> > > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > > > True
> > > >>>> c.create("ubuntu")
> > > >>>> c.destroy()
> > > > True
> > > >>>> c.destroy()
> > > > lxc-destroy: 'r' does not exist
> > > > False
> > > >>>> c.destroy()
> > > > lxc-destroy: 'r' does not exist
> > > > False
> > > >
> > > > New behaviour
> > > >
> > > >>>> c = lxc.Container("r")
> > > >>>> c.create('ubuntu')
> > > > True
> > > >>>> c.create('ubuntu')
> > > > False
> > > >>>> c.destroy()
> > > > True
> > > >>>> c.destroy()
> > > > False
> > > >>>>
> > >
> > >
> > > Won't this break the following?
> > > c = lxc.Container("abcdef")
> > > c.set_config_item("lxc.utsname", "blah")
> > > c.save_config()
> > > c.create("ubuntu")
> > >
> > > I personally always considered ".create()" to mean "generate a new
> > > rootfs" which doesn't at all mean "generate a new config file".
> > >
> > > ".destroy()" on the other hand destroys everything, including the config.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > src/lxc/lxccontainer.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > > index 480c4f5..7a11c85 100644
> > > > --- a/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > > +++ b/src/lxc/lxccontainer.c
> > > > @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_create(struct lxc_container *c,
> > char *t, char *const argv[])
> > > > int len, nargs = 0;
> > > > char **newargv;
> > > >
> > > > - if (!c)
> > > > + if (!c || lxcapi_is_defined(c))
> > > > return false;
> > > >
> > > > len = strlen(LXCTEMPLATEDIR) + strlen(t) + strlen("/lxc-") + 1;
> > > > @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static bool lxcapi_destroy(struct lxc_container *c)
> > > > pid_t pid;
> > > > int ret, status;
> > > >
> > > > - if (!c)
> > > > + if (!c || !lxcapi_is_defined(c))
> > > > return false;
> > > >
> > > > pid = fork();
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Stéphane Graber
> > > Ubuntu developer
> > > http://www.ubuntu.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
> > > Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete
> > > for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam.
> > > $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo
> > > by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Lxc-devel mailing list
> > > Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> S.Çağlar Onur <cag...@10ur.org>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Own the Future-Intel(R) Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
> Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete
> for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam.
> $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo
> by 6/6/13. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/12124-176961-30367-2
> _______________________________________________
> Lxc-devel mailing list
> Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013
Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest.
Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game
on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes.
Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
