Quoting Christian Seiler (christ...@iwakd.de): > Hi there, > > >>In light of the fact that 0.9 is going to be here soon, any > >>comments on > >>this? > > > >Sorry, I was waiting to see if anyone else would comment. Note this > >kind of change is not going to be non-trivial, so it's definately > >(imo) > >1.0 material > > My problem is that the current patch in staging that clears the > environment breaks a lot of things that I'm currently doing with lxc > and I'd really hate to need to manually patch 0.9, especially since we > now have situation where everything I want to do with LXC can be done > with vanilla kernel 3.8 and vanilla LXC 0.9~rc1. > > Since lxc-attach has been there since quite a while and people may have > been using it (especially since kernel 3.8), could we perhaps revert > the patch that clears the environment in attach for 0.9 and implement > it properly in 1.0? (And perhaps backport that part to 0.9.1) I know > that dragging in the complete environment has its own problems, but at > least for me it currently breaks more than it fixes. > > Thoughts?
It seems reasonable to me. Stéphane, ok with you? > The second part of the patch that sets container=lxc is of course not > controversial, that should definitely go into 0.9. > > -- Christian > > PS: I still have a small "fix" for lxc-shutdown in the pipeline that > I'll try to send before Sunday. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
