On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 04:31 +0800, Alexander Vladimirov wrote:
> Well, properly placed hook could do all the things MAKEDEV supposed to do.

And would give us the flexibility to worry about things like serial
devices or some USB devices or a few other things that would ordinarily
be populated by udev but don't vary over the life of the container.

> 2013/1/9 Serge Hallyn <serge.hal...@canonical.com>:
> > Quoting Michael H. Warfield (m...@wittsend.com):
> >> More on the MAKEDEV debacle...
> > ...
> >> This whole thing with MAKEDEV is looking more and more like a morass
> >> with no way to cleanly resolve it.
> >
> > It sounds like consensus is it should be dropped from staging?

+1 for dropping the call to MAKEDEV, yeah.

Regards,
Mike
-- 
Michael H. Warfield (AI4NB) | (770) 985-6132 |  m...@wittsend.com
   /\/\|=mhw=|\/\/          | (678) 463-0932 |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
   NIC whois: MHW9          | An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0x674627FF        | possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master SQL Server Development, Administration, T-SQL, SSAS, SSIS, SSRS
and more. Get SQL Server skills now (including 2012) with LearnDevNow -
200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only - learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122512
_______________________________________________
Lxc-devel mailing list
Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel

Reply via email to