These lines appeared with commit 6f0a4200 and appear to be wrong like Matt Hesley pointed in:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28215685 Moreover, when looking at the signal handler: static int was_interrupted = 0; void interrupt_handler(int sig) { if (!was_interrupted) was_interrupted = sig; } I don't think we need to mess around with SIGILL, SIGSEGV and SIGBUS. Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <gk...@fr.ibm.com> --- src/lxc/lxc_init.c | 3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/lxc/lxc_init.c b/src/lxc/lxc_init.c index a534b51..819194a 100644 --- a/src/lxc/lxc_init.c +++ b/src/lxc/lxc_init.c @@ -101,9 +101,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) struct sigaction act; sigfillset(&act.sa_mask); - sigdelset(&mask, SIGILL); - sigdelset(&mask, SIGSEGV); - sigdelset(&mask, SIGBUS); act.sa_flags = 0; act.sa_handler = interrupt_handler; sigaction(i, &act, NULL); ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
