Ok, thank a lots for the help! I am quite busy at this time, but soon I will provide a clean patch.
Thanks again. On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@free.fr> wrote: > On 05/07/2011 01:53 AM, Francois-Xavier Bourlet wrote: >> >> ok thanks for all the information and example. >> >> I believe that rather than trying to iterate over every containers >> running or not and trying to merge the result we could simply iterate >> only on running container, or only stopped container (I simplify). So >> lxc_for_each could simply take a state in parameter, in case we are >> looking for running containers we only have to look in /proc/net/unix >> else browsing LXCPATH. >> >> But then what about state like booting/stopping etc? Is >> booting/stopping are "running" in some way? Maybe rather than passing >> a state to lxc_for_each we can imagine a boolean parameter with the >> notion of *active* *inactive*, or something with a better name to >> introduce the fact we are looking for "running" container or simply >> registered ones? >> >> I have to run really ofter lxc_for_each, and adding complexity (and so >> slowing down the function) is a big concern for me. I dont need a full >> list of every containers in every state, but only whats is actually >> present in the cgroup filesystem and what is registered. I would >> prefer to let the user (the developer using lxc_for_each) decide and >> implement itself the appropriate complexity. > > Ok, as the name of 'volatile' container is already presented in the man > page, we can add this boolean to lxc_for_each and let the caller of this > function to handle the duplicate names. > > In attachment the routine to look for containers in /proc/net/unix and not > in LXCPATH/<name>. > > So when 'volatile' is set, this routine should be called otherwise the other > one I sent in a previous email. > > > -- François-Xavier Bourlet ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network management toolset available today. Delivers lowest initial acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel