Does it really need to be done on loopback? How about creating a bridge on the host, adding veth devices for each namespace/container and the host, and adding them to the bridge-- this would allow the host and each container to access this private, bridged network, but would not provide external access unless explicitly configured.
E On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Marian Marinov <m...@yuhu.biz> wrote: > Hello, > I want to implement network namespaces in my software. The problem I'm seeing > is that each namespace has its own loopback interface. > Is there any way I can brindge, forward or tunnel the traffic of one loopback > interface (from some namespace) to the real loopback interface on the host > machine? > > Any iptables patches available? Or some trics that are not documented ? > I want all users to have their own network namespaces with their own IPs, but > I want them all to share the host loopback interface for connections to mysql, > pgsql, smtp, imap and so on. > > -- > Best regards, > Marian Marinov > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Create and publish websites with WebMatrix > Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; > WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and > publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf > > _______________________________________________ > Lxc-devel mailing list > Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel > > -- E ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Create and publish websites with WebMatrix Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf _______________________________________________ Lxc-devel mailing list Lxc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-devel
