Hi,
I'm experiencing an issue in LwIP 1.4.1 using PPP.
I have set the TCP_MSS to 1024 bytes and an application is sending large
packets of up to 1400 bytes. On the wire the fragmentation works, my test setup
sends 2 times 1400 bytes via NETCONN_WRITE into an open TCP link. On the
wireshark the output is:
- Fragment of 1024 bytes (Seq. 1, next Seq. 1025)
- Fragment of 376 bytes (Seq. 1025, next Seq. 1401)
- Fragment of 1024 bytes (Seq. 1401, next Seq. 2425)
- Fragment of 376 bytes (Seq. 2425, next Seq. 2801)
So that's working pretty well and also the sequence numbers are indicating
nothing is lost.
Once I'm running the same on the low PPP link, the output via PPP is:
- Fragment of 1024 bytes (Seq. 1, next Seq. 1025)
- Fragment of 1024 bytes (Seq. 1025, next Seq. 1401)
So the second segment of 376 bytes for each packet gets lost. Interesting:
***The sequence numbers are correct!***
So it's not a real "lost fragment" on the wire, in this case the segment
numbers would be out of order and the missing segment would be retransmitted.
Wireshark would indicate an error in that case.
For the slow PPP link the data must be queued in LwIP. So we basically have 4
segments in the TCP send queue:
- 1) 1024 bytes
- 2) 376 bytes
- 3) 1024 bytes
- 4) 376 bytes
It looks as if the second packet of 1400 bytes (starting with 3), which is
written on the connection before 1) was already sent over the PPP link,
overwrites the already queued segment 2).
On the other side I'd expect that in this case the last 376 bytes 4) would be
also sent. But that's not the case - just the two 1024 byte fragments 1) and 3)
are sent over the PPP link - but with correct sequence numbers as if the small
fragments just would not be there.
Also interesting: If I send only ONE 1400 byte packet, both fragments are
happily transmitted.
The data loss does only appear, if a second packet is queued while the first
packet was not yet sent over the link. And it does only appear if the packets
must be fragmented.
It might be that this would also happen via Ethernet, but I'm not seeing this.
But this might be as the link is that quick that the first 2 segments are
already sent when the second packet is written to the connection.
Any ideas how to fix this are highly appreciated ;-)
Thanks,
Marco
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
