It shouldn't do but I had some weird issues communicating between real servers when this happened so I had to modify the IPAddr2 script to remove the IP as there seems to be a bit of a regression with lvs_support=true where it has to match the full IP and subnet to remove, but you need to have the VIP as /32 on loopback and /24 on eth0 On 5 Dec 2013 08:52, "ESWAR RAO" <eswar7...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all, > > > I have a machine where the LVS runs with a VIP on eth0 and the 2 real > backend servers have the same VIP in lo:0 interface. I have added > arp_announce and arp_ignore in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/* > > In the 3 node setup, whenever the LVS node fails , the LVS migrates to any > one of the real nodes. But the VIP is also configured on the lo:0 > interface. > > Does it pose any problem to have same VIP on both eth0:0 and lo:0 > interfaces??? > > Thanks > Eswar > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users > _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
