On 11/25/2012 03:12 AM, David Coulson wrote:
>
> If you use gateway/DR mode, it will not rewrite the IP packet (just
> the Ethernet headers to send it to the real server). So it will go
> the same port (as well as destination IP) as the original packet.
>
> Did you actually try the config and have a problem, or are you just
> assuming it won't work?
Hi,
with my current setup, I'm pretty sure port :80 may get directed to one
realserver, while port :443 may be directed to a different one.
I use marking in iptables, since some directors may be realservers, too.
My ldirectord config is as follows (251 and 2510 - marks made with
iptables):
virtual = 251
protocol = fwm
scheduler = wlc
persistent = 300
real = server1:80 gate 20
real = server2:80 gate 20
real = server3:80 gate 20
real = server4:80 gate 20
virtualhost = example.com
request = "/ping/"
receive = "ALIVE"
service = http
virtual = 2510
protocol = fwm
scheduler = wlc
persistent = 300
real = server1:443 gate 20
real = server2:443 gate 20
real = server3:443 gate 20
real = server4:443 gate 20
virtualhost = example.com
request = "/ping/"
receive = "ALIVE"
service = https
Am I correct to think that to use multi-port persistence, I'd have to
use just one iptables mark, and the following ldirectrd config:
virtual = $NEW_MARK
protocol = fwm
scheduler = wlc
persistent = 300
real = server1:0 gate 20
real = server2:0 gate 20
real = server3:0 gate 20
real = server4:0 gate 20
virtualhost = example.com
request = "/ping/"
receive = "ALIVE"
service = https
(basically, one mark in iptables, and :0 as a port in ldirectord config).
Let me know if that would be correct?
--
Tomasz Chmielewski
http://blog.wpkg.org
_______________________________________________
Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at:
http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/
LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org
Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org
or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
