Hi Sébastien, This issue sounds similar to one I posted a patch to last year. Wensong may have already patched it but I am not sure when a release is expected. Simon or Wensong may best know when the release is scheduled.
Request for patch: http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2011-09/msg00027.html Original post/patch: http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2011-08/msg00033.html Regards, Jacoby On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Seblu <se...@seblu.net> wrote: > Hello, > > ipvsadm 1.26, -L option doesn't work correctly on i686. Option work > correctly with 1.25 or on x86_64. > > After running those 3 following command on a test host > > ipvsadm -A -t 192.168.72.122:80 -s rr > ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.72.122:80 -r 192.168.72.125:80 -g -w 10 > ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.72.122:80 -r 192.168.72.126:80 -g -w 10 > > i got on i686: > # uname -m > i686 > # ipvsadm -Ln > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn > TCP 192.168.72.122:80 rr > -> 192.168.72.125:80 Route 10 0 0 > > We can see a real server is missing. Trying to add it twice trigger a > new error: > # ipvsadm -a -t 192.168.72.122:80 -r 192.168.72.126:80 -g -w 10 > Destination already exists > > So, i supposed it's a listing issue, because entry is present. in > addition, if i test with ipvsadm 1.25, listing is done correctly. > > # cd ~/ipvsadm-1.25 > # ./ipvsadm -Ln > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn > TCP 192.168.72.122:80 rr > -> 192.168.72.125:80 Route 10 0 0 > -> 192.168.72.126:80 Route 10 0 0 > -> 192.168.72.129:80 Route 11 0 0 > > > on x86_64 all works fine with ipvsadm 1.26: > # uname -m > x86_64 > # ipvsadm -Ln > IP Virtual Server version 1.2.1 (size=4096) > Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags > -> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn > TCP 192.168.72.122:80 rr > -> 192.168.72.125:80 Route 10 0 0 > -> 192.168.72.126:80 Route 10 0 0 > > > Those tests was done with a linux 3.2.5 on archlinux and on fedora. > > Regards, > > -- > Sébastien Luttringer > www.seblu.net > > > _______________________________________________ > Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ > > LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org > Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org > or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
