Hello, On 2012-01-09 14:06, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Dmitry Akindinov wrote: > []
>> In our case no SYN packet for an OUTGOING connection would ever be seen >> by an IPVS system, so it does not build a session, so IPVS cannot be used for >> "outoging respose balancing/dispatching". > > I think, you described the setup in previous email. > IPVS supports creating new TCP connection for SYN+ACK packet. > While Netfilter's stateful inspection differentiates SYN > from SYN+ACK packets, IPVS treats them as SYN packet. See > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_proto_tcp.c (tcp_state_idx) and > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c (get_conntrack_index) > for reference. This is the way IPVS to support active FTP for > DR/TUN mode where the real server initiates DATA connection > to client and IPVS detects it by the SYN+ACK packet from > client. So, I think IPVS should support scheduling by SYN+ACK. > [] Thank you very much. Indeed scheduling does work with SYN+ACK. The problem was an incorrect iptables rule. Now it's fixerd an everything works as expected. Thank you! > > Regards > > -- > Julian Anastasov<j...@ssi.bg> -- Best regards, Dmitry Akindinov _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
