On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 06:06:01PM -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm using pulse + lvs on a couple of RHEL 6.1 machines. Pulse and lvs > are working wonderfully so far, though it's all only in testing. > > I'm quite new to LVS. The questions I'm about to ask for the scenario > I'm about to present may be stupid. Nonetheless, I'd appreciate an > answer! > > I have a virtual server configured for a bunch of apache servers. I've > tried to configure a second virtual server listening on a different IP > for a bunch of IIS servers. Of course, I have both virtual servers > using the same port, which is 80. > > If I start pulse, the first virtual server comes up fine, but the second > one fails. For shits and giggles, I changed the port for the second > virtual server to 22, and upon restarting pulse, the second virtual > server started up. I could see the real servers associated with both > virtual servers. > > I'm going to assume I can't have two virtual servers using the same > application port even though their virtual IPs are different. If this is > indeed true, is there a workaround? If there isn't, how should I go > about load balancing IIS and Apache servers with one set of LVS routers?
Hi Ranbir, I'm not sure why you had the problem that you describe, nor am I particularly familiar with pulse, however what you describe is most certainly possible for LVS to achieve. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
