Thanks for the response and sorry for messing up the thread formatting ;) Now I've started to look more into it, it shouldn't be too difficult. The ldirectord resource agent in Pacemaker needs changing to a multi-state RA so it can run in slave mode, then ldirectord itself needs to take another argument to just start the sync daemon.
I'll have a go at implementing this and submit it to Pacemaker. Cheers Darren -----Original Message----- From: Simon Horman [mailto:ho...@verge.net.au] Sent: 18 December 2009 03:20 To: Darren Mansell Cc: lvs-users@linuxvirtualserver.org Subject: Re: [lvs-users] LVS Sync in Ldirectord On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:37:11AM -0000, darren.mans...@opengi.co.uk wrote: > This doesn't seem to be in ldirectord, and it would seem to be a nice > addition. > > > > Has anyone looked at implementing this? Hi, the major problem that I have had with implementing this in the past is that a) the sync daemons are typically used when LVS is deployed in a master/stand-by configuration. b) ldirectord typically only runs on the master For this reason I think that its better to start the sync daemons independent of ldirectord. _______________________________________________ Please read the documentation before posting - it's available at: http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to lvs-users-requ...@linuxvirtualserver.org or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
