-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi,
On 24/9/22 6:10 pm, Andrew McGlashan via luv-main wrote: > On 24/9/22 2:43 pm, Russell Coker via luv-main wrote: >> I've attached a SpamAssassing config snippet for reducing the SA score for >> DKIM signed mail from good domains. You >> could use a larger negative number according to taste. > > Yes, but unfortunately it seems that the bad guys do DKIM, DMARC and SPF > better than many "good" guys. > > That is, the bad guys get it right for their emails and they can still be > very strong candidates for SPAM. > > So long as you are careful with whom the rules apply, choosing only known > good domains that send spammy like emails > that are not spam, well that should be good. Costco had this problem for a very long time, with DKIM being fine, but SPF issues: error client-ip=174.46.207.22; [email protected]; helo=ccintl1.wc09.net - it is less of a problem if servers don't enforce hard fails; - far too many spf rule creators end with soft fail, which IMO, means "we don't the fuck know what we are doing"... Cheers A. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLfjUOoFmvLt+/i+wUCYy69IwAKCRCoFmvLt+/i +3biAQC08xp8sHUJBBSvSwF7arFgdxnnBkLXoRtN44jDJX8KkwD/Yh2Keo1ggZhH iZlb6iiNgVWasMnFgcBIbBGF0zTCAc0= =OuHn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
