On 23/12/16 01:37, Craig Sanders via luv-main wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:57:48AM +1100, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> #!/usr/bin/env bash
> 
> please don't promote thet obnoxious brain-damage. it's bad enough seeing the
> #!/usr/bin/env disease on sites like stackexchange (where at least they have
> the excuse of catering to non-linux systems - and even there it's broken,
> because env isn't guaranteed to be in /usr/bin on all systems anyway) but bash
> will be /bin/bash on every linux system that exists, and always will be.
> 
> there are lots of good reasons why abusing /usr/bin/env like this is a bad
> idea at:
> 
> http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/29608/why-is-it-better-to-use-usr-bin-env-name-instead-of-path-to-name-as-my

Thanks for the reference.

Cheers
A.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to