On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 03:35:34PM +1100, [email protected] wrote:
> On Wednesday, 12 October 2016 2:46:01 PM AEDT Craig Sanders via luv-main 
> wrote:
> > yes, but you can't pipe `btrfs send` to `zfs recv` and expect to get
> > anything useful. my backup pool is zfs.
>
> In the early days the plan was to have btrfs receive not rely on
> BTRFS, so you could send a snapshot to a non-BTRFS filesystem.  I
> don't know if this is a feature they continued with.

nope. from what i've read, they originally intended to make it tar
compatible but tar couldn't do what they needed, so they dropped that
idea.

> Last time I was buying there wasn't much price difference between SATA
> and NVMe devices.  Usually buying 2 medium size devices is cheaper
> than 4 small devices.

right, but there's a difference between the price of Crucial SSDs and
Samsung or Intel. There's also a price difference between having to buy
a pci-e nvme card and not having to buy one.

> > PCI-e slots are in very short supply. and my m/b doesn't have any
> > nvme sockets.
>
> That's a problem for you then.

well, yes, of course it is. we're talking about my system here, and why
I choose 4 cheap SATA SSDs rather than two pci-e SSDs.


> > i'd still want to buy them in pairs, for RAID-1/RAID-10 (actually,
> > ZFS mirrored pairs)
>
> The failure modes of SSD are quite different to the failure modes
> of spinning media.  I expect it will be some years before there is
> adequate research into how SSDs fail and some more years before
> filesystems develop to work around them.  ZFS and WAFL do some
> interesting things to work around known failure modes of spinning
> media, they won't be as reliable on SSD as they might be because of
> the spinning media optimisation.

I'd still use some kind of raid-1/mirroring anyway, no matter what kind
of drives I had. raid isn't a substitute for backups, but it does reduce
the risk that you'll need to restore from backup (and the downtime and
PITA-factor that goes along with restoring)

also, there's no way for ZFS to correct any detected errors if there's
no redundancy.

i don't mind paying double for storage. it's a bit painful at purchase
time, but that's quickly forgotten. and a lot less painful than the time
and hassle required to restore from backup, and losing everything new or
modified since the previous backup (nightly, but that's still up to a
full day's worth of stuff that could be lost.  Now that i've got rootfs
on ZFS, I can snapshot frequently and backup more often with zfs send)

craig

--
craig sanders <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to