Rick Moen via luv-main
<[email protected]> writes:

> Quoting Trent W. Buck ([email protected]):
>
>> When someone says "I need 16K RSA keys",
>> don't they really mean "I want EC keys"?
>>
>> Because, like, RSA needs to be a lot longer than EC to provide the same
>> security level.
>
> I absolutely take you seriously on such things, Trent, but wonder if you
> can refer me to background materials about cryptographic strength.
> (Certainly, I am behind my times on readings concerning ciphers.)

I don't have cites handy; I was just repeating what I heard somewhere.

The two things I remember (from when OpenSSH got EC support) is that

  1. The closed community (NSA/military types) have used EC for about as
     long as the open community have been using prime factorization (RSA).

  2. a 2KiB RSA key is as strong as a <much smaller> ECDSA key.
     That's why ssh-keygen has 256/384/521 ECDSA & can't do 4KiB ECDSA.

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to