On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:22:16AM +1000, Russell Coker via luv-main wrote:
> 
> So my plan now is to use something simple for sending GPG encrypted
> mail (which is a small portion of my email) and use Kmail for the
> majority of mail for which it works quite well.
> 
> What do you recommend?

I've recently returned to using Mutt since Thunderbird shat itself.
Depending on your mail volumes Thunderbird with Enigmail might
suffice, but I can no longer recommend it, especially to anyone I
suspect has mail volumes comparable to my own.  ;)

Mutt still has one considerable advantage for GPG which all the
competition has yet to meet: if you compile it with GPGME support and
enable that option in your .muttrc then it will have complete access
to *everything* in GPGME (even though Mutt itself doesn't use all of
that, the potential is there).  These are the perks of a mail client
which Werner Koch used for a number of years and so he wrote all the
code to hook Mutt into GPGME directly.  Though he's switched the Gnus
now, so I guess that's an option too (if Emacs is your thing and if I
recall correctly it isn't).


Regards,
Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to