> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 07:28:38AM +0000, James Harper wrote: > > As long as I remember to replace the To: with luv-main each time I > > reply, I guess it's workable. > > that happens even on just plain Replies, too - not just Reply-All? > > that's weird because the list munges the From: address, so a reply should go > to the list. >
Yep. Reply and Reply-All from Outlook 2016. Not sure who to blame for standards violation here... > > > 233 Remaining_Lifetime_Perc 0x0000 067 067 000 Old_age > > > Offline > - > > > 67 > > > > 233 is reported as Media Wearout Indicator on the drives I just > > checked on a BSD box, so I guess it's the same thing but with a > > different description for whatever reason. > > i dunno if that name comes from the drive itself or from the smartctl > software. that could be the difference. smartctl. It has a vendor database concerning what each of the values are, so if the manufacturer of you drives says 233 = "Remaining Lifetime Percent", and the manufacturer of my drive says 233 = "Media Wearout Indicator", and the authors of smartmontools were aware of this, then that's what goes in the database and that's what gets reported. > > > > I assume that means I´ve used up about 1/3rd of its expected life. > > > Not bad, considering i've been running it for 500 days total so far: > > > > > > 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0000 100 100 000 Old_age > > > Offline - > > > 12005 > > > > > > 12005 hours is 500 days. or 1.3 years. > > > > I just checked the server that burned out the disks pretty quick last > > time (RAID1 zfs cache, so both went around the same time), and it > > i suppose read performance is doubled, but there's not really any point in > RAIDing L2ARC. it's transient data that gets wiped on boot anyway. > better to have two l2arc cache partitions and two ZIL partitions. > > and not raiding the l2arc should spread the write load over the 2 SSDs and > probably increase longevity. > <snip> > > > I've seen too many OCZ's fail within months of purchase recently, but > > not enough data points to draw conclusions from. Maybe a bad batch or > > something? They were all purchased within a month or so of each other, > > late last year. The failure mode was that the system just can't see > > the disk, except very occasionally, and then not for long enough to > > actually boot from. > > i've read that the Toshiba-produced OCZs are pretty good now, so possibly a > bad batch. or sounds like you abuse the poor things with too many writes. > Nah these particular ones were just in PC's, and were definitely not warn out (on the one occasion where I actually got one to read for a bit, the SMART values were all fine. Servers get SSD's with supercaps :) > even so, my next SSD will probably be a Samsung. Despite initial reservations (funny how you can easily find bad reports on any brand!) I have been impressed with the performance and longevity of the Samsungs, but I still don't have enough datapoints. James _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
