On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 02:27:07 PM Dan062 via luv-main wrote: > > I've run kvm guests directly, without virsh installed, while also > > managing them from the console. Thus, whether you actually need virsh > > depends on your requirements and environment. > > What you are saying is true, But inmho, virsh give you far more control > over the VM (eg: snapshots, connecting devices live etc). While you may be > able to do the same without virsh, using it to me is much easier, > specially if you are doing it remotely.
Virsh does seem to have some nice features, but I don't really need them. All I want is start, stop, and console access. That said I'll investigate Craig's suggestions to see if I can make virsh do what I want, that would be the easiest solution. Thanks for the suggestions! -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
