On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:20:54 PM Chris Samuel via luv-main wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 03:50:54 PM Russell Coker via luv-main wrote: > > The list server is configured to reject mail that fails DKIM or SPF > > checks. It is not supposed to receive mail from other list servers or > > forwarding services so there's no reason for mail to fail such checks. > > > > If you have a problem with mail from your ISP going to the list then > > contact me off-list and I'll help you file a bug report. > > > > If you have a problem with your own personal domain then I am happy to > > send you log entries related to your issue and help you debug it. > > > > Don't claim that there's something wrong with the LUV server though. > > I'm not, RFC-2822 "Internet Message Format" is (IMHO): > > # [...] The "From:" field specifies the author(s) of the message, > # that is, the mailbox(es) of the person(s) or system(s) responsible > # for the writing of the message. The "Sender:" field specifies the > # mailbox of the agent responsible for the actual transmission of the > # message. > > It appears to me that what should go in the Sender: field is instead ending > up in the From: field and that seems to be in clear breach of the RFC.
Chris, my entire point here is to not mix up the issues of DKIM/SPF checks on receipt and the issue of how the From: field is used. No mail has been rejected due to changes to the From: field. Some mail has been rejected because it doesn't pass DKIM/SPF checks. When someone's mail is rejected due to DKIM/SPF failures then I'm happy to help diagnose that problem. But it's not related to mailing list changes. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
