Jeremy Visser <[email protected]> writes: > From a sysadmin perspective [systemd] makes my life easier by bringing > service control up to (and beyond) the standard of Windows, which has > been able to supervise processes since, gosh, I only started counting > in Windows 2000.
So sort of like djb daemontools or (as you mentioned) upstart? It's not like systemd is the first thing to do this in Linux. > The syntax is not as friendly as upstart, but this is a minor detail. > [...] and doesn't interfere with muscle memory by still being able to > do "service foo restart". upstart supports "service foo restart". > From a sysadmin perspective killing off pesky child processes is SO > last century. You may well argue that every instance where child > processes linger when the parent dies is a bug in the application. > Well, good luck fixing every one. I'll see you next millennium. In > the meantime, I'm enjoying getting actual work done. Not sure what you mean by that. > I find a good analogy for the way cgroups improves management is > thinking about the ways in which virtualisation also improves > management. cgroups were also available long before systemd :-) _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
