On Tue, 14 Oct 2014, [email protected] wrote:
> Linux is developed by more people than just Debian Developers, I
> regularly submit well researched bug fixes to various projects, including
> the kernels framebuffer code (one of linux's more difficult areas to work
> in). Very much time is spent on making sure
> these are well valued contributions. DD's are not the only ones spending
> time in Linux code.................

Would you like to have a bunch of people who know nothing about framebuffer 
code start telling you what you should be doing?  What if they start saying 
that such code should be the subject of a democratic vote among people who 
have never read it?

> This is getting me no where, I am not surprised systemd is getting plenty
> of opposition as most of its proponents appear now to be incapable of
> giving a clear explanation of why they support it. I have better things to
> do with my development time than try and figure out a project with
> apparently no clear goals (as so far none has been given).

We had lots of long discussions when the issue was still up for debate, you 
can read them if you wish.  Then when no consensus was reached the technical 
committee made a decision, you can read their analysis of the situation if you 
wish.

This thread on luv-main was never about explanations of systemd.  It was 
always about people who have decided against it without reason who think that 
they know more about the topic than people who use systemd and have read the 
code.

Changing an init system is not such a big deal.  We went from BSD style to 
SysV without any serious problems.  Ubuntu went to Upstart and it worked 
reasonably well for them even though almost no-one in Debian used it.

Solaris uses a very different init system that apparently works well enough 
for them.

Apple has yet another different init system which apparently inspired some of 
the design decisions for systemd.

Examples have been cited of systemd developers being difficult to work with.  
But this mailing list has given plenty of examples to show that anyone who 
wants to work on systemd must ignore unqualified people.

Submitting framebuffer bug reports doesn't make you qualified to assess the 
Debian project's decision about init systems.

Most people involved in this discussion could have spun up a virtual machine 
running systemd in less time than they spent arguing.  Why not just test out 
systemd and see if it works for you?

-- 
My Main Blog         http://etbe.coker.com.au/
My Documents Blog    http://doc.coker.com.au/
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main

Reply via email to