On 11.10.14 23:35, James Harper wrote: > It's a few clicks away, but lol: > > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1404.0/01336.html > > --- a/fs/read_write.c~a > +++ a/fs/read_write.c > @@ -513,6 +513,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(read, unsigned int, fd, > struct fd f = fdget_pos(fd); > ssize_t ret = -EBADF; > > + BUG_ON(!strcmp(current->comm, "systemd"));
And Linus' post to which that is a reply: > Key, I'm f*cking tired of the fact that you don't fix problems in the > code *you* write, so that the kernel then has to work around the > problems you cause. > > Greg - just for your information, I will *not* be merging any code > from Kay into the kernel until this constant pattern is fixed. ... > Kay - one more time: you caused the problem, you need to fix it. None > of this "I can do whatever I want, others have to clean up after me" > crap. It appears that the arrogance of the proponents of the abomination extends beyond megalomanic feature creep, and not just the users wish they'd find something useful to do. Erik -- On the basis of evidence we may be sure that we are wrong but we can never be sure that we are right. - Richard Feynman _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
