Jason White <[email protected]> writes: > Spamassassin - when last I used it, accuracy wasn't adequate (at least for > classifying my mail) and it tended to be memory-intensive if Bayesian > filtering was enabled.
I use SA, with spamd and memory usage isn't as much of a problem as it was 10 years ago or something. It turns out I have (at least) an order of magnitude more RAM in boxes running SA now. I find it fairly accurate. I also fed it large amounts of spam/ham to train it... and I honestly never look in what it classifies as spam. -- Stewart Smith
pgpj4Xb17Mpyf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
