Hi, Good thing I don't know what "module loading" is, or I'd be worried.
My first impression was that the motherboard BIOS settings determine boot-up device sequence, but you're obviously talking about something different -- and potentially relevant for me. Carl On 22/04/14 12:14, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Jeremy Visser <[email protected]> writes: > >> On 21 Apr 2014, at 17:19, Carl Turney <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Want to disable UUID, and address hardware directly by device and >>> partition specs. >> >> Hmm. >> >>> My knowledge is low. (Barely understand what I'm writing.) >> >> Hmmmmm. >> >> There benefits of UUIDs outweighs the disadvantages for the majority of >> users. Given your own admission of a lack of knowledge, what makes you sure >> you want to second guess what is a very sane default made by technically >> capable decision-makers? >> >> You have every right to shoot yourself in the foot, so I won’t stop you, but >> I’m curious why you want to do so. > > +1. > > The biggest reason for this is decreased determinism in module loading > order -- e.g. at least *in theory* it might load USB, then PATA, then > SATA one boot, then next boot it loads SATA then USB then PATA. > > _______________________________________________ > luv-main mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main > _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
