On 30/09/13 17:51, Peter Nunn wrote: > The Burser, whom I do have some sympathy for, given the amount of crap > he's been told, has made the decision that Linux is 'too risky', after > consulting other bursers on some network of bursers (god knows) and > being advised that "Linux is no good in an education environment, can't > get staff, no-one uses it except a few 'out there risk takers'". Of > course the M$ suppliers are pushing the same line.
He has a point. You call up a random IT company — they are a Windows shop. The reality is that there are more Windows shops than Linux shops. >From his perspective, it’s about redundancy. He can throw out one lot of IT people, replace them with another lot, and they will still be able to support the system. He can’t find a Linux shop just by walking up the street or finding the first IT company in the Yellow Pages. _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
