Hi!

I'm in the process of doing just that. But my usual process for doing this has 
been "broken" between 2.15.4 and 2.16.1.
There seems to be config sections being processed when they shouldn't.
I'm trying to build client packages with dkms enabled but without explicit 
modules, and some of the kernel config tests are being run even without modules 
enabled.

I.e. what I want to do is this
configure --enable-dist
make dkms-debs

but during config (in make dkms-debs) it tries to do lnet kernel and lustre 
kernel config checks.
In my opinion this is wrong and something that.

It boils down to
configure --enable-client --disable-modules
doing the wrong things during configure, i.e. testing for things that are only 
needed during actual building of the dkms modules.

I'll try to sort this out but any help will be useful.



________________________________________
From: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of 
Ramiro Alba Queipo <ramiro.a...@upc.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 10:15
To: lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
Subject: [lustre-discuss] Compiling lustre 2.16.1 for Ubuntu 24.04 client

Hi all,

We need to compile lustre 2.16.1 and produce packages for Ubuntu 24.04 client, 
as available packages are no compiled with infiniband so ko2iblnd module is not 
present.
We are doubting about using a fixed kernel like 6.8.0-31-generic or using dkms 
to recompiling on the fly when updating kernel, because of problems that might 
be raising when compiling with other kernels 6.8.0-XXX-generic. Might we have 
such a problem? What do you recommend me?

Thanks in advance
Best regards

--
Ramiro Alba

Centre Tecnològic de Tranferència de Calor
http://www.cttc.upc.edu/<http://www.cttc.upc.edu/>

Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeries
Industrial i Aeronàutica de Terrassa
Colom 11, E-08222, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
Tel: (+34) 93 739 8928
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to