Alastair No, 2.16 is not an LTS release and there are no plans to issue ongoing releases for it I corrected the * on the table - thanks for pointing that out.
Peter On 1/10/25, 9:03 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Alastair Basden" <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of a.g.bas...@durham.ac.uk <mailto:a.g.bas...@durham.ac.uk>> wrote: [You don't often get email from a.g.bas...@durham.ac.uk <mailto:a.g.bas...@durham.ac.uk>. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> ] Hi Andreas, Thanks. Is there likely to be a RH 9.5 release for 2.16 imminently? I also notice on the support matrix that 2.12 is still designated as the LTS in the second table (with the * against it, rather than 2.15). Cheers, Alastair. On Thu, 9 Jan 2025, Andreas Dilger wrote: > [EXTERNAL EMAIL] > It looks like lustre/ChangeLog lists 2.2.15 and the builds are currently > using 2.1.15, and there is a patch to fix a build problem for 2.2.3: > https://review.whamcloud.com/57452 <https://review.whamcloud.com/57452> > > I've updated the support matrix to reflect this. > > Cheers, Andreas > > On Jan 9, 2025, at 05:36, Alastair Basden <a.g.bas...@durham.ac.uk > <mailto:a.g.bas...@durham.ac.uk>> wrote: > > Hi, > > On the Lustre Support Matrix page (wiki): > https://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/PUB/Lustre+Support+Matrix > <https://wiki.whamcloud.com/display/PUB/Lustre+Support+Matrix> > it mentions ZFS version 2.2.3 for the 2.16 release. > > However, at > https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release/el9.4/server/RPMS/x86_64/ > > <https://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/latest-feature-release/el9.4/server/RPMS/x86_64/> > only the 2.1.15 ZFS release is present. > > Am I correct in thinking that the wiki is wrong, and that we should be using > the ZFS 2.1.15 with Rocky 9.4 and Lustre 2.16? > > Or is there a missing ZFS 2.2.3 package somewhere? > > Cheers, > Alastair. > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > <http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org> > _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org <http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org> _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
