The kernel is 5.14.0-362.24.1.el9_3. I ended up getting updated source
files from DDN support for lustre-2.14.0_ddn168, & lustre-2.14.0_ddn154 in
addition to already having the older lustre-2.14.0_ddn136.

Interestingly enough, based on the Lustre compile instructions with ZFS
<https://wiki.lustre.org/Lustre_with_ZFS_Install>, , I used  ./configure
--disable-ldiskfs --disable-server.  I got ALL of them to compile with that
and the running make rpms. I haven't tested the RPMs yet but wanted to
share.

On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 12:37 AM Andreas Dilger <adil...@ddn.com> wrote:

> What client distro/kernel are you using?  Typically, if it is a newer
> kernel (e.g. Ubuntu24.04) you will need to get a newer version of the
> client to build with that kernel.
>
> On Sep 16, 2024, at 13:37, Rob Kudyba <rk3...@columbia.edu> wrote:
>
> You don't often get email from rk3...@columbia.edu. Learn why this is
> important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
> Using gcc 11.4.1 20231218, autogen.sh then ./configure works but make
> fails here:
>
>   CC [M]  /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.o
> In file included from include/linux/mm.h:7,
>                  from include/linux/pagemap.h:8,
>                  from
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.c:28:
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.c: In function
> ‘llcrypt_zeroout_range’:
> include/linux/gfp.h:341:25: error: passing argument 1 of ‘bio_alloc’ makes
> pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
>   341 | #define GFP_NOWAIT      (__GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM)
>       |                         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                         |
>       |                         unsigned int
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.c:100:33: note: in
> expansion of macro ‘GFP_NOWAIT’
>   100 |                 bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOWAIT, 1);
>       |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.c:30:
> include/linux/bio.h:421:58: note: expected ‘struct block_device *’ but
> argument is of type ‘unsigned int’
>   421 | static inline struct bio *bio_alloc(struct block_device *bdev,
>       |                                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.c:100:23: error: too
> few arguments to function ‘bio_alloc’
>   100 |                 bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOWAIT, 1);
>       |                       ^~~~~~~~~
> In file included from
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.c:30:
> include/linux/bio.h:421:27: note: declared here
>   421 | static inline struct bio *bio_alloc(struct block_device *bdev,
>       |                           ^~~~~~~~~
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.c:107:17: error:
> implicit declaration of function ‘bio_set_op_attrs’
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   107 |                 bio_set_op_attrs(bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, 0);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[6]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:299:
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs/crypto/bio.o] Error 1
> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:585:
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs/libcfs] Error 2
> make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:585:
> /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136/libcfs] Error 2
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:1928: /home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136] Error 2
> make[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/kernels/5.14.0-362.24.1.el9_3.x86_64'
> make[2]: *** [autoMakefile:1152: modules] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136'
> make[1]: *** [autoMakefile:684: all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/lustre-2.14.0_ddn136'
> make: *** [autoMakefile:550: all] Error 2
>
> Is there a workaround for this?
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-discuss mailing list
> lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
> --
> Andreas Dilger
> Lustre Principal Architect
> Whamcloud
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org

Reply via email to