No, and I'm not sure I agree with you at first glance. Is this just generally an idea that data stored on SSD should not be in RAM? If so, there's no mechanism for that other than using direct I/O.
-Patrick ________________________________ From: lustre-discuss <[email protected]> on behalf of John Bauer <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2022 12:48 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [lustre-discuss] Avoiding system cache when using ssd pfl extent When using PFL, and using an SSD as the first extent, it seems it would be advantageous to not have that extent's file data consume memory in the client's system buffers. It would be similar to using O_DIRECT, but on a per-extent basis. Is there a mechanism for that already? Thanks, John _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
