Hi, are there plans to enable use of zfs-2.0+ with Lustre 2.12.x ?
Saw this commit in b2_12: 317beee6a5 LU-15026 zfs: Fix ZFS(2.0.0-1) build error on CentOS (3.10) Best Regards Fredrik On 2021-11-22 14:37, Peter Jones via lustre-discuss wrote: > Hi Einar > > Based on the results we see in the OpenSFS community survey, the data clearly > shows that the majority of sites stick to the LTS releases. Lustre 2.12.8 LTS > is in release testing ATM. From survey results again, most current Centos > users intend to use either Rocky or Alma when they move to 8.x versions. > > Peter > > On 2021-11-22, 5:29 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of Einar Næss Jensen" > <[email protected] on behalf of > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hello everyone. > > Thanks for all help in the past. > We are in the process of installing a new lustre system, and we are > unsure what version to use. > Our current system is 2.10, and we are debating wether we should go for > 2.12.x lts, 2.14.x or wait for new lts version > > Is there an expected release date for next lts? > > Do you (the community) stick to lts, or do you run the more recent > versions? > > > BTW: What is Lustre plans with regards to centos? Will Rocky be the way > forward? > > > Best Regards > Einar > > > > Sent from my ICE X Supercomputer > Einar Næss jensen > [email protected] > +47 90990249 > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > -- Fredrik Nyström, National Supercomputer Centre [email protected] _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
