On Sun, 14 May 2017 11:03:23 -0600, Aere Greenway wrote:
>I do lament the coming demise of all 32-bit machines, but I will move 
>on, when it is necessary to do so.    

A while ago I replaced my around ten years old 64 bit dual-core
mobo/CPU with a newer elCheapo 64 bit dual-core mobo/CPU. It doesn't
cost much, but it gained a lot. That 32 bit architecture is dropped by
all major distros makes sense. It's not comparable to "get a new iPad
each 5 years or you don't get an update anymore". My around 10 years
old 64 bit system was really outdated and a few things already would
have need a replacement, at least the fans and the power supply. IMO
ethically it is ok to replace a machine after around 10 years.
Supporting 32 bit architecture doesn't make much sense, even with
keeping the Third World in mind, since we've got 64 bit architecture
for longer than 10 years. If you need to repair, resp. replace something
of a 64 bit machine, getting a new 64 bit machine already is less
expensive, let alone a 32 bit machine, even if we are using as much as
possible from trash. Keep in mind that all major distros still compile
64 bit architecture for SSE2, while proprietary software for Linux a
long time ago required more than just SSE2. IOW distros still compile
for ancient 64 bit architecture. You should expect that soon or later
even support for some oldish 64 bit machines gets dropped.

-- 
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users

Reply via email to