I haven't much knowledge about captive portals; What exactly do they need from a web browser? Why other browsers than Mozilla's aren't useful for C.P. scenario?
El 12/08/16 a les 16:53, Brendan Perrine ha escrit: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:33:47 +0200 > Narcis Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: > >> - Why Mozilla software is kept instead of CUPS?? What about Midori > Unfortanetly not having firefox on the live session could make a pain of > trying to use the live session and not have internet acess on places with > captive portals. I would be shocked if they tested their portal with midori > and unlikely the people making it have ever heard of midori. I don't like > captive portals but unfortanetly they are a reality even at places my linux > users group meets. > > I am not sure many people on this list in places that don't need > fonts-noto-cjk show part of the full package descrption " This package > contains Noto font families for Traditional Chinese, > Simplified Chinese, Japanese and Korean:" Which is well over a billion > people can use this. > > > Well gnome-disks has the really nice feature of being able to check on the > hardware of the drive you install onto this can be quite frustrating if it is > actually bad and does not install or if say it does not boot you can check > hard disk seems fine in smart data from the live session. I do think Gparted > is better at managing partitions. > > These are some reason why these packages make sense in the live session. > > -- Lubuntu-users mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
