> c. marlow wrote: > > [...] What makes CLAWS better than say Thunderbird? or EVO? [...]
Just some examples: In my experience, both, Claws Mail and Sylpheed use a lot less memory (RAM) than Thunderbird and Evolution. Thunderbird and Evolution are using a lot more memory (RAM). Also, Thunderbird is no longer being actively developed by Mozilla, see: https://blog.lizardwrangler.com/2012/07/06/thunderbird-stability-and-community-innovation/ https://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird/New_Release_and_Governance_Model By the way: I am not too familiar with Qt email clients yet, but, as far as I can see, there is only one Qt email client available which can compete with Claws Mail and Sylpheed in terms of memory (RAM) usage. And that is Trojitá (http://trojita.flaska.net/). However, at the same time it seems to offer less features than Claws Mail and Sylpheed. So, not sure if it really could replace Claws Mail or Sylpheed. Just saying. Regards -- Lubuntu-users mailing list Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
