On 06/08/2013 12:52 PM, Ali Linx (amjjawad) wrote:
I have failed to produce that issue no matter how many times I have tired.
I even tried below 256MB of RAM but that did not crash the
installation at all. YES, the installation process was SO SLOW but
never crashed, in all my tests.
So, I'm not defeating the idea as a whole, I'm stating what I've found
and what my so many tests for 2 years had shown and proved to my, at
least.
It is not that I don't believe you, but I can't disagree with my eyes too.
Ali:
I am sure what you state from your experience is true. But what I state
from my experience is also true.
My experience differs from yours. That probably means there is a
difference in how we go about installing a system on a 512 meg RAM machine.
If you usually use a bootable USB, then the following paragraphs apply:
I almost always use the live CD, because my low-RAM machines won't boot
from a USB-drive without making use of 3rd party software. Also, many of
the candidate machines have only the old type 1 USB, which is slower
than a CD.
If Lubuntu needs to be installed from a USB (for machines having 512 meg
RAM), it ought to be clearly stated, and there should be a way of
creating such a USB that works, and doesn't require typing commands in a
terminal (if ordinary users need to do it). Also, there need to be
links to the 3rd-party software to allow your machine to boot from a USB
(for cases where the hardware doesn't support it).
--
Sincerely,
Aere
--
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users
