Hi Phill, I'm glad that we continue to get alternate iso files for Lubuntu :-)
Best regards Nio Den 2015-10-30 kl. 14:24, skrev Phill. Whiteside: > Hi Nio, > > Walter had a look into it, there was some sort of configuration > mis-match which Colin Watson (release team guru, and all round nice guy) > says he has now resolved. The alternates *should* appear at build time > today (16:29 UTC is cron job and the alternates take approx 30 mins to > build, with the desktop images arriving about 60 minutes later). > > Regards, > > Phill. > > On 30 October 2015 at 06:55, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi again Phill and Julien, > > I noticed that Lubuntu Xenial has appeared at http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com > but there are no alternate iso files to test. (I notice that Ubuntu > Server and Netboot have appeared, and I guess that they still have the > debian installer.) Is this only temporary, or will the Lubuntu alternate > iso files be abandoned? > > If this is the case, I can understand why you, Phill, wrote about > the OBI. > > Best regards > Nio > > Den 2015-10-28 kl. 19:33, skrev Phill. Whiteside: > > Hi Nio, > > > > I cannot over state how much I want to see OBI become an adopted system. > > You have worked tirelessly on it and in my humble opinion not only does > > it work better and more consistently than others, it has fantastic > > support documentation. > > > > @Julien, I know that things are now in flux as to how ubuntu and debian > > repos will work, but can you look to have this system accepted into the > > debian repos so we can offer it as a real alternative to the existing > > "will not work with this, will not work with that" systems that are > > currently on the 'approved' list. > > > > Regards, > > > > Phill. > > > > On 28 October 2015 at 18:01, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com> > > <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>>> wrote: > > > > Den 2015-10-27 kl. 22:30, skrev Julien Lavergne: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm currently drafting work items for 16.04, you can see the > state on > > > the blueprint : > > > > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/lubuntu-x-dev-items > > > > > > I'll try to focus on GTK part this cycle. > > > > > > If you have ideas / comments ... it's time :-) That will be > nice to > > > have the blueprint ready for UOS (I'm working during the > event, but > > > that should not stop you to discuss the items :-)) > > > > > > Regards, > > > Julien Lavergne > > > > > > > Hi Julien and all other Lubuntuers, > > > > I suggest that we consider replacing the Ubuntu Startup Disk > Creator. If > > I can get help to get *mkusb* into a debian or ubuntu > repository, I > > think it is a good alternative, otherwise other alternatives > might be > > better, for example *unetbootin*. See also the following link, > > > > 'Selecting a tool to create USB boot drives from ISO files' > > > > http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2291946 > > > > As you can see 'in late posts in that Ubuntu Forums thread', > there are > > plans to make the Startup Disk Creator simple and reliable, > but maybe > > too simple for Lubuntu users. > > > > Best regards > > Nio > > > > -- > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa> > > <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa> > > Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net> > > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net>> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa > <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa> > > <https://launchpad.net/%7Elubuntu-qa> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > > -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
