I did one hour ago :-) Den 2015-03-12 18:20, Walter Lapchynski skrev: > So the bug you mentioned is a dupe that says fix released. Might want > to comment on the official bug if you wish to disagree. > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 1:16 AM, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Den 2015-03-04 20:38, Nio Wiklund skrev: >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> Continuing testing I found that cryptswap does not work even when it is >>> run alone in a 'use the whole disk' installation. This is a bad bug. >>> >>> It seems to be an old bug: >>> >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/953875 >>> >>> I found what I think is this bug in a system installed from the Lubuntu >>> Vivid alternate 32-bit daily iso file. >>> >>> vivid-alternate-i386.iso >>> >>> cryptswap is there when I reboot from the installer, but the second time >>> I reboot it is gone. >>> _____ >>> >>> /etc/crypttab: >>> cryptswap1 UUID=b66610ce-376c-42cf-8d02-8983f2a40d70 /dev/urandom >>> swap,cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 >>> >>> blkid: >>> /dev/sda1: UUID="63725e48-ebeb-4c33-a023-d34191a6b2bd" TYPE="ext4" >>> PARTUUID="ef7fb1de-01" >>> /dev/sda5: PARTUUID="ef7fb1de-05" >>> >>> modified /etc/crypttab: >>> # <target name> <source device> <key file> <options> >>> cryptswap1 /dev/sda5 /dev/urandom swap,cipher=aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 >>> _____ >>> >>> Hint to the developers: It works with the modified crypttab >>> >>> So it seems that the device information is wrong in /etc/crypttab. Maybe >>> it would be better to have to PARTUUID than the device /dev/sda5. >>> >>> Best regards >>> Nio >>> >> >> Hi again, >> >> John Hupp helped me find more information about the cryptswap bug. See >> comment #37 of the bug report >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/953875 >> >> I can confirm that it works as a work-around, and there should be enough >> information in the bug report >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ecryptfs-utils/+bug/1310058/ >> >> to squash that bug. >> >> We are also getting help from ventrical at the Ubuntu Forums to test >> various encrypted systems. See the following link >> >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2266912 >> >> I try to sum it up in post #35 of the Ubuntu Forums thread. >> >> -o- >> >> We should not be surprised that 'Encrypted home' is no longer part of >> any [other] Ubuntu flavour test-case. It does not work :-( >> >> There are certainly user cases, where it would be useful, but 'Encrypted >> home' has been buggy since March 2012 when Alan Pope reported bug >> #953875. I think it is a bad idea to make a separate test-case for it now. >> >> So let us go ahead with the alternate test-cases, modified only at these >> places: >> ----- >> 'No' for encrypted home directory # Changed from 'Yes'. This is the most >> important modification. >> >> 'Yes' unmount mounted partitions in the target drive # Additional item >> which is important. >> >> 'No' to install grub boot loader to master boot record. Instead select >> the target drive for the bootloader manually. # Changed from 'Yes'. This >> is optional but I recommend it because the automatic choice often >> creates problems for me. >> ----- >> >> Best regards >> Nio > > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
