I agree with Walter: Lubuntu is low resource while still being somewhat user friendly.
Lubuntu - ultra light foot-print Xubuntu - medium light foot-print Best regards Nio Den 2015-03-05 19:05, Walter Lapchynski skrev: > I only somewhat agree. We're not targeting non-Linux users, but that may > be part of it. Either way, the focus is on being low resource while > still being somewhat user friendly. > > Xubuntu is light compared to Ubuntu, but not Lubuntu. We are the light > option that still includes a GUI and a suite of useful apps. > > @wxl > Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA > Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact > Ubuntu Oregon Team Leader > > On Mar 5, 2015 9:51 AM, "Istimsak Abdulbasir" <saqman2...@gmail.com > <mailto:saqman2...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 2015 11:39 AM, "Walter Lapchynski" <w...@ubuntu.com > <mailto:w...@ubuntu.com>> wrote: > > > > Lubuntu has always been for low resource machines. Many of these > will be converts of old traditional operating systems, so it's > important to make them feel at home. > > > So you agree with Nio's explanation of target audience? > > >Secondarily, it's for those that want a complete but low resource OS. > > > I am not quite clear what complete means. Could xfce be considered > low resource? -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
