so tl;dr if we have testers, there's no reason to say that dev can't support it just the same as anything else?
wxl On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Phill Whiteside <phi...@phillw.net> wrote: > Read why I totally left. > > some person with the brains of a slug decided to over-ride the lubuntu > release-manager (me, at the time) and release lct100. It was not released > because at no time had it been tested. So, when a.n.other from release team > decided it should be released, he over-rode my "do not release". The ISO > promptly killed the 1 st machine it was installed upon and lubuntu were > blamed for not supporting armac100...... As you can guess, the reply to that > accusation was why and when I left that bunch of incompetent idiots... > > but, do have fun :) > > Regards, > > Phill. > > On 10 November 2014 21:15, Walter Lapchynski <w...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> >> So I'm thinking about getting an arm board to help with testing. Any >> reason why Lubuntu doesn't want to and/or hasn't supported arm? >> >> -- >> @wxl >> Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA >> Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact >> Ubuntu Oregon LoCo Team Leader >> >> -- >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >> Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > > > > -- > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw -- @wxl Lubuntu Release Manager, Head of QA Ubuntu PPC Point of Contact Ubuntu Oregon LoCo Team Leader -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
