On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Artemgy <launch...@artmg.org> wrote: >> On Tue, 14 Oct 2014 11:04:42 -0700 <w...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>>> totally missing in our quality efforts. >>> I agree and would like to know more about triaging. >> I guess it would be nice to have some context so others who are less >> aware would know, so here's the official page on triage: >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Triage > As a bug reporting noob I have found triaging pages (for the relevant > sub-system) invaluable for improving the quality of my own reports. A > collection of links will be a great start, and then we can gradually > fill out Lubuntu specific triaging notes, to help anyone who creates > reports - as well as those who join the bug squad. By the way, if you want to be able to assign importance and mark as triaged and/or won't fix, you need to be a member of BugControl: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugControl Long story short on triaging as I see it: 1. Look for dupes. 2. Confirm if you can. 3. Make sure the report is complete. 4. Set status and importance. 5. Link upstream. wxl -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
