On 04/20/2014 10:53 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
Hi everybody,
How are you, my dear friend?
Do you know any difference in the final installed system after using the
desktop installer compared to the alternate installer?
Long story short, none.
There is no difference in the final installed system. I'd be shocked if
there will be any ;)
I'm sure you know why there is an alternate ISO and why there is desktop
ISO = difference in the installer :)
That is all :)
P.S.
That is why for example Ubuntu GNOME don't have alternate as we don't
target the low power machines :)
Best regards
Nio
-------- Ursprungligt meddelande --------
Ämne: Re: Do standard and alternate installs give a different system and
apps?
Datum: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 08:15:13 +0200
Från: Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com>
Till: George DiceGeorge <dicegeo...@hotmail.com>
2014-04-20 01:44, George DiceGeorge skrev:
Do the Alternate Install
and the Standard Install
both give the same system and apps after installation
or are there differences after installing?
http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/trusty/release/lubuntu-14.04-alternate-i386.iso
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/14.04/release/lubuntu-14.04-desktop-i386.iso
[george]
I'm not sure if the installed 32-bit systems are exactly the same, but
at least they are very similar. I have not noticed any difference.
There is at least one significant difference concerning the 64-bit
systems: Only the desktop installer can install into UEFI, if I remember
correctly.
But I am also interested in observations from other users, or even
better, from the developers :-)
Best regards
Nio
--
Ali/amjjawad
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
Post to : lubuntu-qa@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
