On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 05:10:27PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote: > Hi all, > > We have the intention of deprecating the urcu-signal flavor in the > future. We are asking users of URCU for _feedback_ on this before > going any further. > > Part of this decision is that we are adding support for TSAN in URCU and > the signal flavor deadlocks with TSAN. It is also my understanding that > the urcu-signal flavor was historically made as a fallback for system > lacking the membarrier(2) system call. Nowadays, most systems have > support for that system call, making the urcu-signal an artifact of the > past.
No objections here. I will need to do a little rework of my book, but I can do that. ;-) > The following is a proposed timeline of events: > > 1. Asking for feedback from users of URCU (this message) > 2. Disabling the signal flavor by default and adding --enable-flavor-signal > 3. Removing the signal flavor Makes sense to me! Thanx, Paul _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev