Am Do., 20. Mai 2021 um 16:19 Uhr schrieb Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com>: > > ----- On May 20, 2021, at 8:18 AM, lttng-dev lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org wrote: > > > Instead of creating functions for each loglevel, simply pass the > > callback as argument. > > > > Further pack all preprocessor information into a struct that > > the compiler already can prepare. > > This introduces an ABI break too late in the cycle.
So 2.14 would be the next chance I guess > Also, I'm not so keen on adding an indirect call on the fast-path > when it's not absolutely needed. Code seems pretty similar: https://godbolt.org/z/oK1WhWqGT > What is wrong with having one symbol per loglevel ? Macro-magic is cumbersome to edit, more code, more relocations. Easier to adapt aswell, could roll my own tracelog functions while using lttng_ust__tracelog_printf (started soind that as I don't want to link to lttng-ust.so) Norbert _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
